The Science of Gay Men in New York Times

Hi friends, I’ve been fighting bad bad bad with the boyfriend lately, and haven’t had the time or the emotional energy to write. I hope you are all doing well. As usual, when I fight with He Who Must Not Be Named, it’s incredibly exhausting, but the makeup sex is just plain INCREDIBLE.

He’s really cute when he’s mad, too.

Here’s something interesting I read in the NYT, I have repeated the stuff we’re interested in, about gay men, because not everybody has a NYT account…

“When it comes to the matter of desire, evolution leaves little to chance. Human sexual behavior is not a free-form performance, biologists are finding, but is guided at every turn by genetic programs.

Desire between the sexes is not a matter of choice. Straight men, it seems, have neural circuits that prompt them to seek out women; gay men have those prompting them to seek other men. “

Pas de Deux of Sexuality Is Written in the Genes - Or, A Review of the Science of “Teh Gay” (registration required, I think)

“Researchers have devoted considerable effort to understanding homosexuality in men and women, both for its intrinsic interest and for the light it could shed on the more usual channels of desire. Studies of twins show that homosexuality, especially among men, is quite heritable, meaning there is a genetic component to it. But since gay men have about one-fifth as many children as straight men, any gene favoring homosexuality should quickly disappear from the population.

Such genes could be retained if gay men were unusually effective protectors of their nephews and nieces, helping genes just like theirs get into future generations. But gay men make no better uncles than straight men, according to a study by Dr. Bailey. So that leaves the possibility that being gay is a byproduct of a gene that persists because it enhances fertility in other family members. Some studies have found that gay men have more relatives than straight men, particularly on their mother’s side.

But Dr. Bailey believes the effect, if real, would be more clear-cut. “Male homosexuality is evolutionarily maladaptive,” he said, noting that the phrase means only that genes favoring homosexuality cannot be favored by evolution if fewer such genes reach the next generation.

A somewhat more straightforward clue to the origin of homosexuality is the fraternal birth order effect. Two Canadian researchers, Ray Blanchard and Anthony F. Bogaert, have shown that having older brothers substantially increases the chances that a man will be gay. Older sisters don’t count, nor does it matter whether the brothers are in the house when the boy is reared.

The finding suggests that male homosexuality in these cases is caused by some event in the womb, such as “a maternal immune response to succeeding male pregnancies,” Dr. Bogaert wrote last year in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Antimale antibodies could perhaps interfere with the usual masculinization of the brain that occurs before birth, though no such antibodies have yet been detected.

The fraternal birth order effect is quite substantial. Some 15 percent of gay men can attribute their homosexuality to it, based on the assumption that 1 percent to 4 percent of men are gay, and each additional older brother increases the odds of same-sex attraction by 33 percent.”

2 Responses to “The Science of Gay Men in New York Times”

  1. The Science of Gay Men in New York Times » Sinful Sodomy Gay Oral Anal Sodomy Says:

    […] Original post by admin […]

  2. kiiutpwzjo Says:

    Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! qmicookujes

Leave a Reply


Free Gay Men Videos And Photos in these Totally Free Gay Man Galleries: